Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of content and features on The Jim Rome Show


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was '''Delete per WP:NOT#INFO and verifiability concerns. Content can be merged into main article, I can e-mail the content on request'''. 1 != 2 22:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

List of content and features on The Jim Rome Show

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an unbelievably long list of things that have happened on The Jim Rome Show. It's unsourced, indiscriminate, and un-encyclopedic. Note that this is not the show's Wikipedia page. CastAStone//(talk) 20:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The show is obviously notable but WP:NOT. We don't need a list of every single caller/nickname/take/in-joke on the show, especially as most of it is original research. If there's anything really important, cover it in the show's page. Bleeding Blue (talk) 23:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Most of it was covered in the show's page until recently. It was moved to its own page because the show's page was becoming very longFrank Anchor, U. S. American (talk) 18:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Clearly notable. Describes the content of the Jim Rome Show and how the show is unique.  More sources could be added howeverFrank Anchor, U. S. American (talk) 18:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * That's what The Jim Rome Show article is for; which, by the way, is also a disaster filled with unsourced "facts" and in-jokes that are similar to the filler in this list that is completely un-encyclopedic. The only reason that page isn't on AfD for it's content is that it's a very notable show. This list is not notable. Please explain why any of this belongs in an Encyclopedia instead of on a fan site.--CastAStone//(talk) 19:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete Article is far too elaborate of a list. The show's main article has adequate content on most of these. I would not change what the show's main article says about the show's content.  I would also delete the related Soundbites featured on The Jim Rome Show, which is a similar list. <Baseballfan789 (talk) 22:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Should we have two articles for every show. One titled "X Show" and the other the content of X Show"? This is exactly the right sort of content to be weeded very sharply and integrated into the main article. I accept Frank's statement that it was too long, and the remedy should have been to cut it. DGG (talk) 10:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep This is the most complete explanation of what the Rome show is about. I think it is extremely valuable in helping people understand the show as it has tons of inside jokes.  Please don't delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmycaps (talk • contribs) 22:11, Dec 10, 2007
 * This user only has 4 contributions to Article-space, 3 were to page in question.--CastAStone//(talk) 03:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.