Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of contract killers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 01:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

List of contract killers
This list is unnecessary. We should just move all of the articles in it to Category:Contract killers and then make a subcategory for the fictional ones. A Clown in the Dark 03:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep until someone does the work of moving it into categories.  Wh e  re  (talk) 04:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, categories can't repose red links. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 04:07, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per redlinks, and that a subcategory for the fictional ones cannot be made since most of them don't have articles. Punkmorten 09:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep reluctantly. Jud e  (talk,contribs,email) 09:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep absolutely. What is it with lists anyhow? Lists and categories are both valid and should both be kept. Jcuk 13:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for now, hire a hitman to delete later. I've moved my thoughts on this one to Talk:List_of_contract_killers. Cleanr 23:43, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep\Rename --Haham hanuka 19:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and post inclusion criteria. Seano1 23:08, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, categories are categories and list are lists. No red link can be found in a category. --Ter e nce Ong 09:42, 3 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.