Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries by future Human Development Index projections of the United Nations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:14, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

List of countries by future Human Development Index projections of the United Nations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have honestly tried hard to improve this article by digging up the cited sources with no luck. As such there is a lot of questions still open. Is this really relevant? How does this list compare to UN HDI list from last year etc etc. I don't see how this list adds anything. The article itself even states: The Paper cited for this article, however, is not supported by the UNDP Human Development Report Office. While it was originally made available online for review purposes, it was subsequently rejected. Extrakonto (talk) 04:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 14:09, 18 April 2014 (UTC)


 * delete One of the odder combinations of WP:AWARD and WP:CRYSTAL I've seen in a while, more or less the analogue to "List of actors by probability of getting an Academy Award in ten years". Given that the data is aging it's hard for me to see keeping a list of increasingly aging predictions. Mangoe (talk) 19:21, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research Secret account 15:13, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * delete I was the one nominating for deletion but would also like to weigh in. This page doesnt seem to add any value. Extrakonto (talk) 17:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.