Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cricket topics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 16:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

List of cricket topics

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The page has become unwieldy and redundant and seems to be no longer maintained - last edit was in November. It was created just before Wikipedia's categorisation system was implemented mainly for (I believe) using the "related changes" function associated with entries on the page. That facility is now offered in WikiProject Cricket/Articles which is updated regularly by User:WatchlistBot. Several editors have discussed AfD'ing the page previously (see Talk:List of cricket topics but this has not been actioned. &mdash;Moondyne 13:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominator. &mdash;Moondyne 13:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletions.   -- &mdash;Moondyne 13:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Page is redundant now since there is a maintenance page as a subpage of the WikiProject. Terence Ong 13:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete first off, holy crap. so, this is an insane list. if someone wants to know about cricket i'm sure they can somehow access all these articles from the main cricket page. a redundant list with no redeeming value and seems like a long shot for improvement. --Tainter 15:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It should have been a subpage of the WikiProject, not in article space. But delete now, rather than move, because it has been superseded. Stephen Turner (Talk) 17:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete enormous, redundant, practically useless list that can be done as a category instead. Hut 8.5 18:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete it is becoming an eyesore and its better to get the information needed from the main Cricket related articles.. Cometstyles  talk


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.