Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cricketers to score a double hundred in their hundredth Test


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

List of cricketers to score a double hundred in their hundredth Test

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A list that does not meet WP:LISTN and has no navigational purpose as it only contains Joe Root and there is no absolute guarantee that any other cricketers will be joining him any time soon. The content is already covered adequately in Root's article and I don't see that there would be a much of a case for turning this into a redirect either. This borders on being a non-encyclopaedic cross-categorisation anyway and we do not need an article on every single interesting cricket statistic. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete; per WP:NOT and WP:LISTN. Already covered in List of cricketers who scored a century in their hundredth Test. wjematherplease leave a message... 13:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - definitely a non-notable intersection, and I can't see the point of List of cricketers who scored a century in their hundredth Test either. A player scoring 100 in their 100th game for their country is a cute coincidence but I don't see how it is encyclopedic -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clear case of stats for stats sake. Nigej (talk) 20:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - A clear case of delete here. HawkAussie (talk) 23:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete a list of one is not notable enough to meet WP:NLIST. And not a particularly useful redirect to the hundred in the hundredth Test article. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete This is not even a list, as only one person is on it. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pure statscruft. Ajf773 (talk) 08:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.