Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of culinary fruits


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 00:28, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

List of culinary fruits

 * - (|View AfD) (View log)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Opentag (talk • contribs) 2010/12/09 19:16:34
 * Delete as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:LINKFARM#LINK
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep This list provides encyclopedic content in that it collects internal links to other articles which further describe the fruits listed. It is a good starting place for someone searching for fruits in common culinary use across cultures. In short, it meets the guidelines for stand-alone llsts and should be kept. Geoff  Who, me?  22:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: Linkfarm policy isn't violated. mabdul 23:18, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep no indication that the reason given for deletion applies here. The list of external links is short, and while some may be debatable, we only would need to delete the links that aren't ideal to fix the problem. If there is any other reason besides this, its not apparent to me, and more importantly has not been proposed by the editor.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

I am strongly opposed to the deletion and I think deletion of articles, except if really necessary (in case of hate speech, for example), is completely wrong and not in accordance with the founding principles of this project. So were the articles about me deleted, without any strong argument, except for the fact that I am "not known enough", despite millions saw me on BBC, ARD and other international media. --Rastko Pocesta (talk) 20:15, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * You're a fruit!? :)


 * Keep This is not a link farm, just an ordinary Wikipedia list. Colonel Warden (talk) 22:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. The only delete vote comes from the nom, a single-purpose account that has few or no edits other than attempts at list deletion. --Karnesky (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per Karnesky, mabdul, Mercurywoodrose and all. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 00:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep useful, well-defined, comprehensive article. Esn (talk) 02:07, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.