Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current Star Magic artists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

List of current Star Magic artists

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Poorly sourced and unreliable. An article for Star Magic also already exists, so if "artists" should be mentioned, it should be in the article of Star Magic instead of a separate article. TheHotwiki (talk) 07:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related pages because: a. Former artists of Star Magic is poorly sourced; b. article for Star Magic batches is trivial. Artists and "batches" could be covered in the article of Star Magic, which isn't a long article - if deemed necessary.TheHotwiki (talk) 09:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge to Star Magic. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 09:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 09:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 09:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment There is also an article List of former Star Magic artists that is also the same reason as the subject being nominated. If you guys want to nominate it for deletion, then go. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 09:23, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * It is now included in this petition, along with List of Star Magic Batches.TheHotwiki (talk) 09:37, 28 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per Hotwiki, poorly sourced. Ctrlwiki (talk) 00:42, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NOTDIRECTORY.--ERAMnc 16:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to Star Magic. Drags4U (talk) 02:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. How is this different from List of Creative Artists Agency clients? An article being poorly sourced is not a reason to delete it. See WP:IMPERFECT. Koikefan (talk) 05:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Well like I said, Star Magic isn't a long article to begin with. Artists could easily be mentioned in that article without a separate Wikipedia article.TheHotwiki (talk) 06:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge to Star Magic: still another Philippine showbiz article violating WP:NOTDIRECTORY. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. It's not necessary to create a list of talents for every talent agency or network. Viva Artists Agency doesn't have one. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 13:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete There are no sources per name saying that it signed a contract with Star Magic so there is a reason it was deleted.--7starunited (talk) 14:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete If we did this type of article for Endeavor or CAA for American performers, this would be laughed out of the room. Wikipedia is not a talent agency database.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:34, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I look forward to you nominating List of Creative Artists Agency clients for deletion. Koikefan (talk) 02:39, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:V. Almost completely unsourced, and many entries don't even have a Wikipedia page. Newshunter12 (talk) 14:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTADVERT. Lists of "current things" are inherently unstable and generally non-encyclopedic. Anyone needing this info can get it from the company's website, which we're currently mirroring. pburka (talk) 01:40, 4 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.