Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of data quality vendors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

List of data quality vendors
Jimbo proded this but the original author de-proded it, so I'm bringing this debate here. As I'm unfamiliar with the background of this article, I will take no sides in this debate. Scobell302 03:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - No information why those are the only included vendors. No sources. It is also likely to be a major spam page. Cheers -- Imo  eng  06:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - It actually was a major spam page with useless external links.--Jimbo Wales 12:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Marketese. Pavel Vozenilek 14:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Useless list (yet another one).  Unless it includes every possible entry, any list is pointless.  We should not be accepting articles on non-finite lists, so, for example, list of US States would be OK (if all 50 there); list of FA Cup winners OK (every year since inception).  But this list will never be complete, does not exist as an entity outside of the article and should go.   Emeraude 17:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Imoeng, Emeraude, and that other guy too. Newyorkbrad 00:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Stack-on delete, pure advertisment spam. Another list that would be impossible to complete, too. Daniel.Bryant 01:10, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.