Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of deaths from the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Clear consensus to keep both here and in the previous AFD which was closed just a day ago, so early close per WP:SNOW. I'll follow up with the nominator on their talk page.result. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

List of deaths from the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deletion review/Log/2020 March 19: "There was some feeling that…the WP:BLP issue could be resolved by changing the list to people who had died of the disease." ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 06:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 06:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I have just noticed that there was a prior AfD which was closed with somehow improper reason(s). However, I won't change my mind. ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 06:54, 30 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. If this violates BLP, so would any article under Special:PrefixIndex/list of deaths. The argument that (potentially false) information about someone's infectious disease status can cause them harm doesn't apply if the subject is deceased. userdude 06:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Snow keep — per the same AfD that was literally closed not even 24 hours ago on the grounds of a snow keep (which is actually not "somehow improper" as the nominator incorrectly claims) and Guide_to_deletion. I think it's rather disruptive –a clear case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT– that User:Sanmosa continue with this AfD despite the overwhelming community consensus reached less than a day ago to retain the article. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 07:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Importnant article.--Petar Milošević (talk) 07:56, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm amazed this is even a consideration. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 08:16, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:20, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Previous nomination closed 24 hours ago, nominator suggests a potential title or list criteria change which doesn't come under the scope of AfD. Ajf773 (talk) 08:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, of course, and nominator should be admonished. Brycehughes (talk) 08:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per all of the above. --IndexAccount (talk) 08:53, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy and snow keep We've just had a discussion and decided to keep. There is no reason to re-visit that decision now. Bondegezou (talk) 09:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I decided to IAR and re-open the discussion. I am so curious that how come you all can ignore the consensus made in previous discussion(s) (what I mean is this). ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 12:20, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I asked an uninvolved administrator at WP:AN to have a look at this page.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:32, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Obvious snow keep, for the record--Ymblanter (talk) 12:33, 30 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Come on now, really not on to nominate again so soon after a snow keep. 阝工巳几千凹父工氐 (talk) 12:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep we just had this discussion and, as far as I can tell, the nom did not provide an actual deletion rationale. L EPRICAVARK ( talk ) 12:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and snow keep. Given the previous discussion closed as snow keep less than a day ago this is disruptive. Thryduulf (talk) 12:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.