Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of deaths in EastEnders


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete and redirect. Wickethewok 14:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

List of deaths in EastEnders
This list can already be seen in the article Storylines of EastEnders, it doesn't need its own article. Trampik e y (talk to me)(contribs) 10:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, its redundant per nom. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 12:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * We merge duplicate articles. That does not involve deletion at any stage of the process.  Please only bring articles that you want an administrator to delete to Articles for deletion. Uncle G 13:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment, there is no need for a merge. All information in List of deaths in EastEnders is already present in Storylines of EastEnders. Thats why he lists it, correctly, here at AfD. Alternatively, a simple redirect would do the job. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 15:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Wrong. I repeat:  We merge duplicate articles.  These articles are duplicate articles, therefore they should be merged.  If the source is a subset of the target that merger is a trivial one.  Listing it at AFD is incorrect, in either case.  Please read Merging and moving pages and familiarize yourself with article merger and the fact that it does not involve deletion or AFD at any stage. Uncle G 16:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)\
 * Wrong. Deletion is appropriate in this case.  We delete POV forks (or should, anyway), per existing policy.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect, hardly anything here to be called POV, switched to my second option per the Uncle. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 08:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Storylines of EastEnders. Molerat 13:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, then redirect. There's no need to keep the history.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Smash it over the head with a doggy doorstop aka delete ;) -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.