Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of devices with video output over USB-C


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:18, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

List of devices with video output over USB-C

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a list of products with a particular feature. The list is pretty big, suggesting that feature is not particularly notable or an novel differentiator among products. I don't think there's encyclopedic value in such a list, so this seems to only serve for promotion of the individual products. Many non-links, so the products themselves often aren't notable. Very few references. This broad list will never be current and will be quite difficult to support. Fails WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:NOTCATALOG, WP:RAWDATA. Mikeblas (talk) 17:46, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:47, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:57, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:57, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, as well as WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. Ajf773 (talk) 20:35, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Ajf - this is an unnecessary list if I've ever seen one. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 20:39, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom a pretty useless page Mosaicberry (talk • contribs) 23:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Before writing such an article, one must ask self: Who is this going to benefit from this 100 years from now? The answer is: No one. This article helps a minuscule group of today's shoppers only. The average effective life of a smartphone is only 5 years and Wikipedia is not a shopping guide. flowing dreams (talk page) 11:38, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Just to note, the majority of this article is not about smartphones but desktops/laptops which would have a longer lifespan generally. This would not change the outcome of the AFD.Mosaicberry (talk • contribs) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * It seemed to me that it is mostly about smartphones, as it list 70 of them. flowing dreams (talk page) 08:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Laptops and desktops together make up more. Mosaicberry (talk • contribs) 08:47, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Alright. Give a few minutes to reassess.
 * Desktops have very long effective lives, but I can't say the same thing for laptops. Regardless, it seems I was wrong that the list's usefulness is tied to effective life of the device. It is tied to the device being in stock and video output over USB-C being fashionable. flowing dreams (talk page) 13:19, 6 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete, Per nom. non useful list and not notable. Alex-h (talk) 12:58, 4 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.