Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of diplomatic missions in Bangalore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Bangalore. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

List of diplomatic missions in Bangalore

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It doesn't help to have a list of diplomatic missions in Bangalore if none of them are linked. Also I don't think it's of any use to anyone other than to diplomats (and I think they already have a paper book with the information.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puntaalpo (talk • contribs) 02:01, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC) Note: Please consider reading WP:INDAFD which includes some points about WikiProject India AFDs. Those may or may not be applicable here. Tito ☸ Dutta 04:25, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Partial Merge to Bangalore. The existence of Consulate Generals is notable, but can easily be mentioned in the main city article as it really only needs a single sentence.  The existence of honorary consulates, trade commissions and virtual trade commissions aren't really that notable as often times an honorary consulate is just someone operating out of their own home.  So in summary mention the Consulate Generals of France, Germany (linked) and Britain; possibly the consulates of Japan and Israel; no need to mention the rest. Ravendrop 03:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.