Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of dog breeds recognized by the FCI


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 02:08, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

List of dog breeds recognized by the FCI

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG, unnecessary FORK of List of dog breeds that relies solely on a single WP:PRIMARY source. If anyone is truly curious about what breeds the FCI are recognising they can visit their website, which incidentally is the only source used for the list. The breed standards, which make up the bulk of the citations, are all included on the breed pages, there is a dedicated parameter for the link in Template:Infobox dog breed.

Additionally nominating the following redirects that relate solely to this page, they were all redirected to this page in December last year following this discussion (link not great):

Cavalryman (talk) 01:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:34, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:34, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete List of dog breeds has a sortable column dedicated to the FCI classifications so a duplicate article is unnecessary. Reywas92Talk 07:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Reywas92. I have been waiting for this one, it is truly unnecessary and possibly not kept up to date.  William Harris Canis lupis track.svg talk Canis lupis track.svg 07:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasoning of Reywas92 and WP:CFORK. There is no need to duplicate an article where this content can already be easily found. All the redirects should be removed as per G8. Ajf773 (talk) 08:11, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Entirely redundant with existing lists as others have mentioned. Kingofaces43 (talk) 18:03, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.