Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of downloadable airline timetables


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

List of downloadable airline timetables

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NOT. Just a directory of external links. I previously tagged this for speedy A3, as it contains no content except external links. User:DGG removed the db tag, claiming it "may be controversial". The criteria for speedy deletion as CSD A3 is; "No content other than external links of whatever kind", and apart from the introductory sentence, this is only a list of external links, so IMO this qualifies for speedy deletion. Masaruemoto 04:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete advertisement.-- Sef rin gle Talk 05:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nomination reason. Cs1987 05:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anarchia (talk • contribs) 06:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an internet directory. This is more or less tantamount to a directory of airline websites. We should have links to the company website, where users can find the timetable if they want it, but they should be in the articles of each airline, not as a separate article. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:17, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; these links belong on each airline. John Vandenberg 10:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 10:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertisement and/or Vanity Article. Pursey 12:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete —  unencyclopedic, and is in violation of Wikipedia Not.Yamaka122 ...  :)   13:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete agreed with nominator. Carlosguitar 14:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per non and WP:LISTCRUFT. User: (talk • contribs • count) 14:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, per nom. Good grief. --Calton | Talk 15:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Sjakkalle. Like Sefringle, I also view this as an advertisement, because the content can have no conceivable use other than to promote commercial transactions: it has no encyclopaedic value. Jakew 16:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per WP:LISTCRUFT. Bravedog 17:18, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a directory, nor a haven for listcruft, nor an external links deposit. This page is quite clearly all 3 - indeed, by title alone it's going to run in to WP:NOT problems. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 15:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above. Bearian 01:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.