Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of downloadable songs for Rocksmith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  00:38, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

List of downloadable songs for Rocksmith

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Downloadable content (DLC) cruft, no indication of notability, single source from publisher. Fails WP:GNG and indications that it probably other guidelines such as WP:PROMO (see Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/permlink). Bri (talk) 22:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator unanimous keep !votes amongst trusted editors shows that this nom was a mistake; valid SIZESPLIT. Merging this back to the main article would not be desirable. Bri (talk) 00:34, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep This is essentially valid PAGESIZE content fork for a list/table split from the main article(s) due to size. In addition, even as a standalone list, it should pass WP:LISTN, as reliable sources regularly have covered the DLC releases of the game: [. This was just 3 pages into over 100,000 results in [[WP:VG/RS]]'s reliable source custom search. This article is watched over by several established editors, as far as the COI/N post goes (As are most of the articles noted there). -- ferret (talk) 22:48, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -- ferret (talk) 22:48, 30 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - Recent COI edits on a 700+ revisions, 5-years-old article are no ground for deletion (WP:NOTCLEANUP). This list seems to meet WP:LISTN, unless is arguing that the entirety of Category:Lists of video game downloadable content and Category:Music video game soundtracks should be deleted?? ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  22:50, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep or at least merge. (edit conflict) There are plenty of hits for each one of these content packs from WP:VG/RS: AFI, Iron Maiden, Maroon 5, Radiohead, REM, Smashing Pumpkins... At the very least, there are enough sources for each one (all?) of the packs, though there is admittedly less commentary on them as a group (e.g, ). This said, I'd view this as a size split from the main article. The table still needs some columns removed and condensed, but it would likely overwhelm the main article, and contains sourced info. czar  22:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.