Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of dubious and uncertain giant squid sightings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. I know it's a little presumptuous to do a snow closing with a single keep vote, but the fact that this "list" contains no items and has not contained any items in its nearly full year of existence makes it borderline speediable in any case. — Verrai 22:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

List of dubious and uncertain giant squid sightings

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A list with no contents, which is just as well, because if it had "sightings" it would be original research to decide which ones were dubious and which were uncertain. I've just seen a giant squid walking past the window, it's a bit dubious and uncertain, can I add it to the list? Masaruemoto 00:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete you can't add your sighting because its obviously not real. The giant squid is right here in my bathroom toilet - I just saw it. - eo 00:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This is lidicris. There are simply too many of these to document much less write a good article on them. DBZROCKS   Its over 9000!!!  00:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per everything said above —  Wen li  (reply here) 01:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * (EC) Delete. List article that's lacked an actual list since its creation more than ten months ago. I don't see the point (or the squid). Deor 01:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * (EC) Delete ridiculous and unencyclopedic article. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete because giant squid are never dubious and always certain, so there can never be any entries. —Quasirandom 02:42, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, likely speedy for nonsense. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I have to admit, I like the title, but this is nonsense. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  04:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "I opened up my frazzles and there 'ee was!" There's no list which kind of defeats the object, enough time has passed to assume that it's a dead project.Someone another 05:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, and only add the referenced, believable, and plausible sightings. --Ouro (blah blah) 08:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Almost anything addedd to this article would be OR. Listcruft. ff m  13:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge contents to List of dubious and uncertain Wikipedia articles. JJL 13:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as an article with no content, although the title gave me a good laugh. The fact there is actually an article called List of Colossal Squid specimens and sightings and another called List of giant squid specimens and sightings actually gives me hope for civilization. If this article actually had the same sort of content a those two, it might be viable, but at the moment it doesn't say anything and only serves to direct people to those other articles. 23skidoo 16:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Immediate Delete Come on, just look at the title... Mindraker 20:42, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly. Part of me loves the title though... '' •C H ILL DO UBT•     21:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.