Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of enemies in God of War


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

List of enemies in God of War

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It fails both WP:V and WP:NOT, and is certainly not encyclopedia standard. Thebladesofchaos (talk) 03:47, 23 June 2011 (UTC) Thebladesofchaos (talk) 00:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - The article is a weak attempt at being a game guide, and not a very well written one at that. It is essentially subjective, opinionated commentary - and as such is WP:OR - best suited to a fan page (e.g. "Pandora's Guardian: A 20 foot tall undead Minotaur wearing nearly impenetrable armor. It guards the tomb of the Architect's son in the segment of the Temple of Pandora dedicated to Hades. It was placed there as a final test to anyone who had made it that far through the temple in an attempt to claim Pandora's Box. Kratos kills it by first chipping away its armor and then firing the ballista at it, impaling it to a door".)
 * Keep - Let the page stay. You said start a fan page for it and this is what I had to come up with. Too bad we can't merge any enemy info with the God of War series page. Rtkat3 (talk) 10:02, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * By your own admission it is a fan page. This is fine, but it is not suitable for Wikipedia. You need to create your own page and add the information there. Feel free to use the links posted above to examine guidelines if it helps you to understand why the article is inappropriate.
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete This page was already discussed and should have been redirected, but regardless, it was transwikied to StrategyWiki here. --I Jethrobot (talk) 16:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Transwiki as needs be and delete - Not encyclopedic. Far too much focus on a subject with no notability. OSbornarfcontribs. 01:08, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. —chaos5023 (talk) 01:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of God of War characters. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 04:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Can't merge as material is substandard to begin with and fails all the above mentioned tests. Thebladesofchaos (talk) 10:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * A merge need not merge the entire corpus of the article being merged, it could just take a few lines condensed from the former article. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 05:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I can't see anything worth keeping, not even " a few lines" as it is all fancruft. Best suited to a fan page elsewhere. Thebladesofchaos (talk) 05:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Is not built from secondary sources, does not explain how the topic is notable, as is not in accordance with our guidelines for fiction (WP:V, WP:N, WP:WAF). re: transwiki, fan/game guide content already extensively written about at wikia. Marasmusine (talk) 10:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: The content is not appropriate for Wikipedia since Wikipedia is not a video game guide. The article doesn't provide references, so the text is original research by synthesis at best. There are no reliable secondary sources that cover this list to presume that it is appropriate per the criteria of notability for stand-alone lists. The article does not provide reception or significance in the real world for the fictional characters so it is a plot-only description of a fictional work. As the list falls into what Wikipedia is not, it is not acceptable per the criteria of appropriate topics for lists. There is not even a hint that it could possibly meet the general notability guideline. There is nothing worth merging since nothing is referenced. Jfgslo (talk) 02:17, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.