Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of entertainers related to academics (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 16:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

List of entertainers related to academics
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Queried speedy delete & AfD delete. Author claims improvements since previous delete. Anthony Appleyard 12:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Improvements or not, the problem is the whole idea of such a page. Random intersection based on ill-defined and ultimately undefinable criteria. Snalwibma 13:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonnotable intersection of topics (one of which, "being related to academics," is hardly encyclopedic material in itself). And what's with the cockamamie "See also" list? Deor 14:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no clear inclusion criteria (how related enough is "related"?), probably unmaintainable. shoy  14:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Yet another meaningless list. -- Finngall  talk  15:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as an intersection between two unrelated topics. The fact that a specific individual in entertainment is related to an individual in academics is not notable, even if both individuals are notable in and of themselves.  Useight 16:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - useless and very vague list.  Zouavman   Le   Zouave   17:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Entertainers related to academics...who cares? Cogswobble talk 17:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:LIST. This would seem to be an intersection of two unrelated fields yielding a non-notable result.   B figura  (talk) 22:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete relatively a useless list as mentionned all above.--JForget 22:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per everything said above. —  Wen li  (contribs) 01:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT. There are no improvements to this recreated article. It is just a shorter version that has the same failings, I don't remember anyone in the last afd saying "keep, but make it shorter". Crazysuit 01:14, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, random list. Gazpacho 02:36, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, highly trivial list. RFerreira 04:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, pointless list. Who cares if they're related to academics? J I P  | Talk 04:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.