Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of equipment pairs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete ck lostsword•T•C 00:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

List of equipment pairs

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

By popular demand, another "pair-related" list of loosely associated topics. As with similar lists, such as List of famous pairs and List of food pairs, this has no possible encyclopedic value. Masaruemoto 00:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is also trivial; why is an "equipment pair" important? Why are these on the list, and not others.  What even is an "equipment pair"?  --Haemo 01:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and I don't know if anything else fits this criteria better. Corpx 01:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep IF this article is linked with an article on the English language and a brief mention of the use of pairs. For example, a pair of scissors may not be used in every language (Spanish, German, Japanese, etc. anyone?).  The first part of the article is potentially ok but the bottom part is just opinion.  Whose to say that there aren't other pairs (made up by anyone) such as computer/beef, Ford/Toyota, winner/stalemate, wikipedia/msnbc, etc. Fineday 02:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete it's also just trivia. Oysterguitarst 03:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is an addition I was looking for when the nom AfD'd some similar lists. "Indiscriminate" says it all. Deor 13:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Ugh! Even I, the "defender of crap", can't find a silver lining in this one.  This includes "everything but the kitchen sink" and even that's probably on here as "kitchen sink & garbage disposal".  Even a pair of pliers is on here.  Mandsford 15:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not encyclopedic. Carlossuarez46 17:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.