Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ethnic groups known as "Iranian Turks"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ethnicities in Iran.  Sandstein  13:47, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

List of ethnic groups known as "Iranian Turks"

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is an unsourced list and sounds like WP:OR; both its title and lead/intro. How we know all of those mentioned Turkic ethnic groups call and identify themselves as "Turk"? And no source for that term "Iranian Turks" too. Plus we already have Category:Turkic peoples of Asia. So creating a sub-category named "Turkic peoples of Iran" would be helpful if it's really necessary. Another option is rename/move; e.g. moving it to "List of Turkic ethnic groups in Iran". But the current content of article is just another example of turning category stuff into a pointless list/table. Wario-Man (talk) 03:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, but rename. I've added one citation, . There are things for an encyclopaedia to say about the various Iranian Turkic groups, so I think an article is appropriate, not just a category. What form that article would best take is a harder question: I concur that the current article title doesn't really work. Bondegezou (talk) 08:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, you just added two references without adding any new content to article or expanding it. A list should be notable and offers some additional info but currently this article is just a table version of a category plus its misleading and wrong title and lead. --Wario-Man (talk) 14:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The lead complaint motivating this AfD was that this was "an unsourced list". It now has two sources. I was just trying to address the concerns that were given!
 * The article does offer additional info in that in gives a language and religion for each group (some of which is now sourced). It's not "just a table version of a category". I believe there is material to expand it further.
 * AfD is not clean-up: if the title and lead need changing, then change them. Bondegezou (talk) 15:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Please... Do you really think "It now has two sources" is a valid argument when you have just dropped two sources there without improving the content of article? Both sources are not free to access and require permission/purchase. And you expect other editors do the rest of your incomplete job? That's not the proper way to convince a nominator to change their opinion. I ignore the rest of your comment because I'm not a new user who uses AfD for the first time, and that part of your comment is irrelevant. As I said, this list is just a category with a table. And there is a good home for it: Ethnicities_in_Iran --Wario-Man (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Adding citations to support material in an article is a way of improving it, yes. I am unclear what so upsets you about this. There is absolutely no requirement in Wikipedia for sources to be free to access: see WP:RSC. Wikipedia is always about collaborative, incremental improvements, so I don't feel comments about "expect other editors do the rest of your incomplete job" to be helpful or in keeping with WP:AGF. Bondegezou (talk) 08:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Shouldn't this information all be found at Ethnicities_in_Iran?  D r e a m Focus  15:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I feel there is sufficient material to support a standalone article (with a new name). However, if the AfD concludes otherwise, I would support a merge to that section. Bondegezou (talk) 08:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * IMHO, the problem is not only sufficient material or not, the problem is that this list sounds irrelevant given that we already have Ethnicities_in_Iran. Best regards. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  21:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per my nomination and Move the table/list to Ethnicities_in_Iran. --Wario-Man (talk) 20:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment The Farsi-language page has multiple additional citations and shows a route for possible development of this article. Bondegezou (talk) 08:46, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ethnicities_in_Iran: There is almost no useful information in this list compared to Ethnicities_in_Iran, and the title does not follow the naming conventions either. If there is the need to expand on this topic in the future, a new one could be created with a more fitting title. Esiymbro (talk) 01:25, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per . ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  21:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Demographics of Iran. This title of that list can be a subtopic within the article with the two sources mentioned being used to describe them.--Persian Lad (talk) 04:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * We have Ethnicities in Iran and it has the related section Ethnicities_in_Iran. Any ethnic-related stuff should redirect to that article and the proper section. --Wario-Man (talk) 04:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Ethnicities_in_Iran per and WP:CHEAP. It's notable, but currently is almost all original work and a fork. Bearian (talk) 18:13, 7 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.