Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of evil Power Rangers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep - procedural close. I saw no version in the article's history to which an AfD notice had ever been attached, nor had any ever been added in the history. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

List of evil Power Rangers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

List completely lacks any reliable sources or comprehension, it is purely fan junk. What is defined as "evil"? The list has no context and to the casual wikipedian who is unfamiliar with the subject matter it is terrible given that the article is completely in the universe and not our own. Utterly unencyclopedic reads like a child diary. It is articles like this that people assume our articles are written by kids. Dr. Blofeld      White cat 13:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Article necessitates a laundry list of unencyclopedic miscellanea. -Kuzaar-T-C- 14:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, they don't look evil, not even in a funny way. No match for the real E. S. Blofeld. The case is so obvious that invoking the usual suspects like verifiability, RS etc. itself becomes meaningless... NVO (talk) 08:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. -- SKATER  T. 12:34, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I don't see that the AfD notice has ever been added to the article in question. I could not find a version with one.  Given that this has apparently been relisted, I'd suggest a procedural close as keep without prejudice to starting anew. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.