Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of exhibitions by Shahram Entekhabi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Secret account 20:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

List of exhibitions by Shahram Entekhabi

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is an extensive resume of a borderline-notable contemporary artist and consists of numerous low-profile group exhibitions. I can't find a wiki policy that covers this kind of thing, but WP:RESUME encapsulates my view that the article should be deleted. Although a merge might seem the obvious thing to do, the list doesn't belong on the artist's article either. Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 20:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep : also I think that to keep it would be very usefull concerning all participating artists and curators. the article was helpfull for my research of maping the art practice and art institutes dealing with issues of migration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farhangnama (talk • contribs) 19:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   —Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It patently isn't a resume and is generally pretty useful. By the nominators own omission he's struggling for a policy it violates, clearly Shahram Entekhabi is notable in some circles. Lets get it linked up to the artists page. --Joopercoopers (talk) 21:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It clearly is an artist's resume. Maybe merge a few of the items onto the main article. But this article doesn't have much value.  freshacconci  speak to me  21:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - it seems to me that these individual exhibitions lack notability. Just an indiscriminant list showing that these shows existed, even with Cites, how are they notable? Dont say they are notable because of the Artist 'cause WP:N isnt inherited. And yes, it does tend to read like a Resume. (aside - some of the External links are not to exhibitions either). Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  05:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge Clearly OTT, but at least should be merged back to the artist's article. Johnbod (talk) 09:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Cleanup and Merge with Shahram Entekhabi.- Ravichandar 11:18, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Modernist (talk) 13:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per Exit2DOS2000 Clubmarx (talk) 00:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.