Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of exhibitions of the Bruce Silverstein Gallery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 19:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

List of exhibitions of the Bruce Silverstein Gallery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I understand (and appreciate) the rationale for the creation of this list: it is to make the parent article more than just a laundry list of exhibitions. However, I think this kind of content, even if (mostly) verified, is excessive information, and it shouldn't be in the main article anyway. After all, we are not a directory or a brochure. With apologies. Drmies (talk) 00:07, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: It's fine with me, Dr M, no need to apologise. And I agree that this is not the sort of content we should have; what next, a List of special offers at Walmart? As you have rightly guessed, I hived it off to get it out of the COI mess that is/was the main article. It had enough references even after I'd removed the self-published ones that I felt uncomfortable about simply deleting it outright. But I've no objection to it being summarily consigned to oblivion. Hmm, I don't think I can request speedy deletion as G7 because the content was not written by me. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:24, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Many of these exhibition listings are unreferenced. If the gallery itself is notable (I express no opinion on that), then a much briefer, referenced list of representative exhibitions would be OK for the main article, to give readers a sense of the range of works shown by the gallery. I see no good reason for this fork.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  03:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * DeleteDoesn't seem encyclopedic, after all. Zince  34'   08:02, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as no evidence of notability. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  17:05, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.