Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of exits on Highway 401 (Ontario) (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Highway 401 (Ontario) (action already taken). (non admin closure) Jeni  ( talk ) 09:35, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

List of exits on Highway 401 (Ontario)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I have incorporated this list back into Highway 401 as part of an upcoming featured article process. This article was split several years ago. It is poorly sourced and no longer necessary with the list being on the 401 article.  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  00:34, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete not necessary. --Rschen7754 00:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Highway 401 due to (a) the information already being present in that article, and (b) no evidence of the notability of the majority of this information. I note the last AfD was a no-consensus keep, with a leaning towards merging, which appears to have now happened. - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:07, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect as unnecessary post-merge. Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:14, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I forgot I could just do this myself. The way I figured, this is an unlikely search title, but it's long existance means that several articles on the internet likely link to it. Can I suggest redirecting this to the Exit list section of Highway 401? Also, the main argument at previous afd's was the unruly length of the list. I've cut so much speculation and OR out of the article that adding the massive list back to the article doesn't change the size of it! -  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  01:27, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - The exits can be covered in the Highway 401 article as with every other road article. ---Dough4872 03:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect as a R from merge since the edit history is supposed to be available. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 04:40, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect, Floydian has a good point; while this shouldn't be a separate article, it's somewhat likely to be a search target. Redirects are cheap.  Nyttend (talk) 05:20, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm just going to be bold and do it. The direction of this is pretty obvious, and it can always be overturned by the results of this. -  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  05:23, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Boldly doing it would have been a good plan before the AfD; now that we're at AfD policy suggests you should leave it alone until the discussion's closed. However I'd support an early close if you're able to get an admin to stop by and look the AfD over. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:26, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.