Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of f(x) endorsements


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 16:36, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

List of f(x) endorsements

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is clearly unencyclopedic and does not have any notable information to remain on Wikipedia. It also does not contain any reliable sources. "List of Endorsements" violates WP:PROMO and is just a means of advertising. If Michael Phelps earns $45 million a year from appearances and endorsements 1and he does not have such a list on here, then this article should not either. TerryAlex (talk) 03:44, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  04:19, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  04:20, 23 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Blatant PROMO. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per above - Clearly PROMO. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 21:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Very much PROMO.  Should be summarized and included in prose in the main f(x) article, as this information is almost an indiscriminate list of unsourced information. Shinyang-i (talk) 07:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per INDISCRIMINATE. –Chase (talk / contribs) 02:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.