Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of famous people with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete per CSD G4 and Protect from Recreation Nacon kantari  16:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

List of famous people with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
This list, like its namesake and predecessor, its totally speculative and unencyclopedic. (From the discussion page it looks like there might have been one sourced statement about Emma Watson, and possibly a couple of others, but I can't get the sourcing links to work for me.)  The previous incarnation was deleted; has some information come out since 2005 to cause us to reconsider the validity of this list?

If this info can be sourced and the list pared way down to documented cases, I don't have a problem with this page. But each time the discussion comes up, that seems to be beyond possibility. Better no article by this title than one this speculative. PhilipR 17:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Pernom
 * Speedy Delete -- rehash --Rehcsif 20:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This has twice been deleted, but only via the AfD process, so it doesn't qualify for db-repost. -- Kicking222 22:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * What? The only kinds of deletion exempted from the repost is prod and invalid speedies. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 22:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and protect against recreation. That is, unless I become famous enough to add myself to the list. -- Kicking222 22:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Speculation or original research. Piccadilly 11:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * NOTE: Everything below is an archive of the last time an article by this title was proposed for deletion.  When I added the AfD template and clicked through, this page was already in existence.   Fortunately it just makes my point that this has already been decided.   In fact, I think this deletion could even be speedy since it's been deleted before, but I might be wrong there.  - PhilipR 17:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * NOTE This AfD was originally constructed on top of the old AfD discussion. The new discussion has been moved to here (second nomination) and the original reverted.  The old discussion can be found here 1st AfD-- blue  520  13:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Delete. This list would be better as a category. RicDod 14:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Still has the same problems as described in the first AfD and could be speedy deleted as it is reposted content that was removed.-- blue 520  14:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and salt the earth This is the fourth afd on this related topic: one, two, and three Article db tagged. Regards, MartinRe 14:23, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.