Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of famous people with tattoos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Friday (talk) 17:02, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

List of famous people with tattoos
It's essentially impossible to make a list of every celebrity that has a tattoo. Tattoo should document some of the people who are known mainly for their tattoos, but this list of people who just happen to have tattoos is excessive. Idont Havaname (Talk) 03:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. No utility; no limit; indiscriminate subject matter. Wikipedia is not a blog space for making lists thought up in school one day.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Per nom and Fuhgettaboutit, this is totally unmaintainable and requires OR as to who is famous and who is not. delete ++Lar: t/c 04:11, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Too broad a topic with no limit.--Jersey Devil 04:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unencyclopaedic list. GassyGuy 04:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Impossible to keep this list up. R.E. Freak 05:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 05:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 06:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unmaintainable, unencyclopedic, indiscriminate (I would've said "undiscriminate", but that'd be wrong :P). --Core des at talk. o.o;; 11:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. But should list the tattoos as well. --JJay 12:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Listcruft. Th ε Halo Θ 12:31, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete as per nom. Who qualifies as "famous"? Too hard to make these decisions. Plus it's too hard to verify names on the list. Delete. Allisonmontgomery69 16:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useless, unmaintainable article. Also, see Articles for deletion/Famous people with piercings, which I think should also be deleted. Benji64 18:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Ramseystreet (talk • contribs)
 * Delete Disgustingly unimportant. --Reaper X →T →C 00:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)