Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of federal lands in Colorado


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of protected areas of Colorado. ✗ plicit  11:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

List of federal lands in Colorado

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The majority of this page's content is exactly duplicated at List of protected areas in Colorado, as content from this article was copied to create the protected areas article without any attribution. The two pages were then apparently edited in parallel in a long series of edits by. To resolve the content fork I suggest redirecting the federal lands article to the protected areas article and fixing all of the section hatnotes and redirects that target the duplicated content at the federal lands page. Even though the protected areas page is the duplicate, the state content in the protected areas article is worth keeping, meaning that article is the one that should stay. The only content of the federal lands page not at the proected areas page is already duplicated and redirected to elsewhere (in sections of the Colorado article). A copied template should be added to the talk page to document where the content originally came from. I can do the cleanup if redirecting is the consensus. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, Lists,  and Colorado.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect after any needed merge. Don't think such an obvious duplicate needs much discussion. Reywas92Talk 15:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Reywas. CharlesWain (talk) 04:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * A simple Redirect to List of protected areas in Colorado. The proposal is quite strong and the issue quite evident. -The Gnome (talk) 13:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.