Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional Catholics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

List of fictional Catholics

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This list is almost impossible to verify. There are no sources listed that could back up any of the content on the page. It has been tagged for cleanup and sources since September of 2006. In that time, no sources have been provided for any of the characters and the list has grown longer. I am proposing that it be deleted because it does not adhere to the policies set down in WP:LIST. Cy ru s     An dir on   14:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; unmaintainable. Most of the characters of fiction set in a Catholic country are catholic, so that list would be enormous. Tizio 15:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment As a basis of comparison, look at this page. Every person is sourced and then listed alphabetically. The List of fictional Catholics is lacking any sort of organization that I can discern and is not sourced at all. -- Cy ru s      An dir on   15:23, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - How about list of fictional human? AQu01rius (User &#149; Talk) 17:41, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Dear Lord, please delete this glaring example of an unmaintainable, unsourced list. Amen. Resurgent insurgent 01:39, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Each entry on the list is easily verifiable because presumably all you have to do is go to the book that the character is in. However, per Tizio, it is potentially a very long list with no criteria to determine which entries are encyclopedic and which are not.  This makes it unmaintainable listcruft.  --Richard 05:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unmaintainable. Masaruemoto 04:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.  -- Pax:Vobiscum 08:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.