Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional centenarians


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 00:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

List of fictional centenarians

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-encyclopaedic cross-categorization. The extreme age of these characters is generally a trivial part of their portrayal and not an appropriate basis to create a list per WP:IINFO. Anthem of joy (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete; from a quick look at the list, it's composed almost entirely of characters who are immortal, not characters who simply happen to be very old, so an age-based list is superfluous. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 22:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete; it's totally unreferenced and purely subjective. Immortality makes age irrelevant. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete- indiscriminate trivia. As mentioned, the fact that most of these characters are immortal makes their age pretty irrelevant. Reyk  YO!  04:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment, Just a question though, there is a Lists of centenarians on Wikipedia, so why wouldn't you want a list of fictional ones? If not, should we make it a category? Mathewignash (talk) 01:37, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * None of the centenarians on the lists of real centenarians are immortal and thus of largely irrelevant age. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 02:48, 21 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nomination. The list is subjective and trivial. It appears that none of the fictional characters is notable for being a centenarian, which makes it fail WP:NOTDIR also. Jfgslo (talk) 22:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.