Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters who can manipulate ice or cold


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete ~Kylu ( u | t )  01:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

List of fictional characters who can manipulate ice or cold

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I just don't see Wikipedia needing a list like this.--SeizureDog 23:10, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  23:30, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Just a note, this list was created as a result of this CfD discussion. the wub "?!"  23:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I remember those cats. They serve even less of a purpose as lists though. I don't think either is needed for Wikipedia.--SeizureDog 00:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no coverage for "fictional characters who can manipulate ice or cold", hence this List of them lacks notability too. Corpx 04:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I can't see any reason to keep this. It's like the "power" to manipulate fire or turn invisible, something that, when you get down to it, is not that imaginative.  Time for me to fill the ice tray and manipulate the water into cubes. Mandsford 18:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as listcruft - unencyclopedic/unimportant. Stifle (talk) 13:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 16:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or categorize Perhaps it would be best if the characters were categorized instead? To nom, or anyone here, will List of fictional characters who can manipulate fire, List of fictional characters who can create illusions, List of fictional characters who can manipulate electricity, and List of fictional characters who can manipulate darkness or shadow be marked for deletion also? If so, categorization would be most appropiate in this case. Lord Sesshomaru 20:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I figured I'd test the waters with this list first before nominating the others (which I only noticed after afd). Your suggestion doesn't work, because as it's been said before, they were categories before being turned into lists. I don't think either is needed.--SeizureDog 20:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment No article, no category, sounds like a complete loss. Is it against policy or guideline if I were to keep this article in a sub-userpage to continue working on it? This page would be deleted, of course by the way this survey's going, but can I have the page as my own? Or is that a violation of something? I'm also considering that this list can be completely reformatted and looking like the nice superhuman strength article. Any ideas or concerns? Lord Sesshomaru 20:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not adverse to to idea of having articles on the abilites themselves, but simple lists are crufty.--SeizureDog 19:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.