Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters who can warp reality


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  00:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

List of fictional characters who can warp reality

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Impossible-to-compile list which is also useless. r3m0t talk 21:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Nonsensical nomination. Colonel Warden (talk) 15:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete despite the author's best efforts, there's no real objective way to define "warping reality". For instance, technically every ninja in Naruto can do so with their disguise techniques. JuJube (talk) 15:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No clear criteria for inclusion. For crying out loud, drinking can technically warp reality can't it? Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete on the grounds its missing Sam Beckett from the best show ever. Seriously, delete on weak inclusion criteria that's subjective/OR to say the least based on definition of warping reality and therefore no possible way to have a comprehensive list. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 17:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Last week, people were falling all over themselves to keep several similar and equally uninformative and useless lists of this nature. The reality is that this list is mediocre; if anyone cares to "warp" that reality by hitting the "edit this page" button, I'd reconsider.  Mandsford (talk) 19:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Need I elaborate further upon the above stated opinions? Arkyan 20:25, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The list is far from complete, and a complete list of such characters would be unwieldy and unhelpful.--Jeffro77 (talk) 08:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The author(s) make a valiant effort to define the criteria for inclusion, but this is still uncomfortably subjective and unsuitable for 3rd party sourcing for an encyclopedia article. The list would conceivably change daily with different editors, making it useless as a reference resource for WP users. --AnnaFrance (talk) 15:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR and WP:V. Plus all the other arguments mentioned by the good people above on the list. Arsenikk (talk)  18:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.