Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters with one eye


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. If anyone would like the list in order to make a category, let me know and I'll copy it into userspace for you. Chick Bowen 22:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

List of fictional characters with one eye
I believe this to be of no encyclopedic merit. Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters missing an appendage is of interest. —'' Encephalon 05:42, 21 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Categorize. The list is unusable, but a category would be more appropriate and more convenient. --Hemlock Martinis 05:50, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Categorize per Hemlock Martinis. The article itself is borderline listcruft, but as a category, it'd be perfectly acceptable. EVula 06:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment if its good enough for a category its good enough for a list. Same goes for the articles below. Jcuk 14:18, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Categorise. Perfectly valuable and interesting information, but useless in list form. DWaterson 22:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Interesting topic and it might be the spark for a few good English papers. What's the dramatic value in having characters with one eye? Do these characters share any other characteristics? I'm glad we have articles like this. And although I sincerely think there's a serious value to this article, I'd be for it just because it's that interesting. I wonder if we're not just a leetle too serious around here sometimes.Noroton 00:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete listcruft M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 (T 01:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Listcruft. Sets a ridiculous precedent, we can't have lists of fictional characters with various missing parts.  We'd have to allow lists of characters with green eyes, with blue eyes, etc as well as every other possible way of classifying them.  It's ridiculous, and a category would be ridiculous for the same reason.  And to Noroton, the topic being 'interesting' to you does in no way signify that it should be kept; every article that gets deleted is of interest to someone which is why it was made in the first place.  The wikipedia isn't here to give English majors ideas for term papers, it's an encyclopedia.  --The Way 05:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per The Way. --OGoncho 21:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.