Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional locations in Thomas & Friends


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

List of fictional locations in Thomas & Friends

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Impressively, all 87 footnotes to this article are to the primary source material itself. I'm not finding anything in reliable, secondary sources that treats this is a topic, therefore WP:LISTN does not appear to be met. I'm not seeing a way that this can pass the notability guidelines, at least not in this form. Hog Farm Bacon 17:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 17:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 17:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 17:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. A truly impressive piece of WP:FANCRUFT. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 19:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete- I'm sure there must be a Thomas the Tank Engine fan wiki somewhere that this would be prefect for. Here, it's just excessive fancruft. Reyk YO! 21:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a true case of excessive fancruft.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - in-universe garbage Spiderone  18:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: then call in a drone strike on the article to make sure nothing survived. Total Fancruft  // Timothy ::  talk  19:10, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT. The list is clearly trivial. desmay (talk) 04:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - the reason for deletion is obvious--Cts499m (talk) 20:54, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per LISTCRUFT, FANCRUFT, PRIMARY, NFICTION... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a rather tedious list of cruft. This is trivial and not encyclopedia worthy Lightburst (talk) 17:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.