Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional models (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 06:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

List of fictional models
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously closed in November as no consensus, and there has been little done then to improve the list's content. There are no sources and no demonstrable need for inclusion or how it benefits the encyclopedia. For lack of better word, this is WP:LISTCRUFT. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - There's already a category with the same content. Isn't that enough?!?!Glendoremus (talk) 07:04, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:LISTN requires that reliable sources discuss the topic as a whole, and I don't see evidence of that.  There were a few hits on Google News and Google Books, but they seem to be discussing other stuff, such as fictional models of cars.  If someone finds significant coverage, they can recreate the page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:59, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:59, 13 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per above discussion. Aoba47 (talk) 16:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with above reasoning.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. It fails WP:LISTN with its utter lack of available sources, and is nothing more than listcruft.  64.183.45.226 (talk) 21:36, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.