Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional tobacco products


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. The Placebo Effect (talk) 17:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

List of fictional tobacco products

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Both totally unsourced as well as as a text book violation of WP:NOT. In other words listcruft. There is nothing to show that this should be notable enough for an article, hence it is simply a list of loosely associated items. Per same argument I also nominate EconomicsGuy 09:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * List of fictional gemstones
 * Delete both, as unsourced. There is a fictional jewels category. AnteaterZot 20:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * keep - that's the very point of wiki kernitou talk 07:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete both per nom, better categorised.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 12:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Placebo Effect (talk) 17:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete List of fictional tobacco products. not sure about the gemstones (yet). Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both as unsourced and non-useful lists. Bearian (talk) 17:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.