Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictitious films


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. --Core desat  05:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

List of fictitious films

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - indiscriminate list of items drawn from wide variety of unrelated sources, ranging from films which figure to an important degree to one-off parodies to films mentioned in passing throwaway lines. Otto4711 09:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment - That's certainly a very extensive list. .V. (talk) 14:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep for same reasons I gave in the TV Show version. Potentially useful, and it's worth noting several of these "fictitious films" are in fact notable in their own right, such as See You Next Wednesday. Could use some improvement in terms of formatting, but that's grounds for deletion. 23skidoo 15:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Jcuk 17:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- Per Otto4711-- SU IT  42 18:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. This is one of the lists you have put up for deletion which I believe deserves to stay the most. A lot of people have obviously put a lot of effort into it and quite a few of the entries have their own articles, which is always useful to have in the one place along with others that do not have them. It is a substantial list and very useful! Tartan 23:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, very few of the fictitious films have separate entries. Almost all of the linked film titles link to the film that the fictitious film is parodying. Otto4711 23:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep if you disagree with the current criteria for the list, suggest a change. There is no reason for deletion here.  FrozenPurpleCube 03:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep its a well organized list of defined scope.-- danntm T C 03:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.   -- SkierRMH 04:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It will constantly need to be updated, however, it's quite well put-together as is.  SkierRMH, 04:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep I agree with the Strong Keep above. This is a really cool list, too. Horcado 05:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, the subject is not notable, the list is indiscriminate and unmanageable, just because the concept of fictional films exists doesn't mean Wikipedia must document it. Axem Titanium 05:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Excellent list: useful navigational tool, full of valid and encyclopedic information. Squarely within WP:LIST. Not indescriminate. Tag it for WP:V cleanup then nominate it as a featured list. And don't delete it. AndyJones 13:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:LIST largely deals with the form of lists, not the content of them. Otto4711 01:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Valuable list for reseaching fictional works.Lumos3 15:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.