Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fighting game character stereotypes (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Deleted, slightly expanded version of previously deleted article. GarrettTalk 10:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

List of fighting game character stereotypes
Listcruft, full of original research and like Computer and video game character stereotypes lists archetypes that can be found in any narrative media. Additionally, this article has been deleted before, but I don't have access to the previous version to judge if it's similar enough to qualify for a speedy delete. NeoChaosX [ talk | contribs ] 19:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Xfx55 23:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's interesting original research, but original research all the same. On a side note, Japan related deletions seems like an odd place to put this. Wouldn't computer and video games be more appropriate? Irongargoyle 00:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment editors reflexively put CVG/anime type articles into the Japan related category. ColourBurst 04:49, 10 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete gamecruft, OR. Danny Lilithborne 01:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per first nom, and reasons per above. --Kunzite 04:27, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, though the game nerd in me hopes someone hosts this elsewhere. El Cid 07:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete I just fixed a bunch of links on it and then saw this at the top. I think it's worth keeping.Gregory j 08:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Ace of Sevens 07:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.