Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of first names 2

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 23:10, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

List of first names

 * This article was nominated for deletion on 09:13, 2004-09-05 by User:Violetriga. It was removed from VFD by User:SimonP without recording a result.  For the prior discussion, see Votes for deletion/List of first names.

Pointless, never can be complete, unencylopedic. Transwiki if you must. Delete. Neutralitytalk 03:10, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, a never ending trivial list. Megan1967 06:53, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, see List of dog names from yesterday. Radiant! 08:20, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looking at the previous VfD of this page, I can't find a convincing argument for keeping it. Xezbeth  08:24, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - could be useful to pages like Behind the Name but not necessarily here - Skysmith 09:55, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or add Foot, Footfoot, Footfootfoot, and Footfootfootfoot to it. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 10:05, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, that's one solution if you have quadruplets :) Radiant! 10:54, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * This list fulfils none of the purposes of lists. It provides no information, is useless for navigation, and is a sheer horror when one considers what would happen if it were to be used for development.  Mikkalai's suggestion to use and improve the far better Wiktionary:Wiktionary Appendix:First names instead seems to have fallen upon deaf ears. Delete to make the point more forcefully. Uncle G 18:01, 2005 Feb 15 (UTC)
 * Delete and to quote from Citizen Kane, "Impossible, impossible, impossible..." Wyss 18:52, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; RJH 19:48, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A list of names limited to those that actually have articles would be good, though. --Calton 20:38, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Categories are the tailor-made tools for that, not lists. See Category:People by surname, for example. Uncle G 02:33, 2005 Feb 16 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with Uncle G. --Angr 00:10, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. When would you ever need to use this? -- Robert Pendray 09:53, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A useless and unending list. Carrp | Talk 16:38, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Albeit temporarily because Categories would be a better way of managing this. Querents seek lists of people with a specific forename to answer a variety of questions: inter alia Who shares my name? With whom do I associate my child if I name her/him this? What was the correct surname of Michael Scarsomething? --Theo  (Talk) 19:36, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.