Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foods that are verbs

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash 02:43, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

List of foods that are verbs
Delete. Just a list with no cats, it has no articles linking to it, seems somewhat unmaintainable, and a lot of it is slang. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 23:56, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, please. Tonywalton  | Talk 00:12, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-encyclopedic DV8 2XL 00:16, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no potential to become encyclopedic. It does not embody any kind of concept or principle. It is not a recognized piece of useful information. It is not helpful in the solution of any standard kind of word puzzle. Maybe it's worthy of BJAODN. It certainly is better than most listcruft, because a) you can determine fairly objectively whether a word belongs in the list or not, and b) the total number of such words is neither ridiculously small or ridiculously larger. I confess to actually liking this one. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:39, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd be for e-raisin' that ;) --Doc (?) 13:07, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Egg. Uh, sorry, I mean Delete. Definitely a candidate for BJAODN, though. It may be unencyclopaedic inconsequential gibberish, but it's wonderful unencyclopaedic inconsequential gibberish. Peeper 13:10, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * batter 'til wafer thin, oil and crisp in oven until deleted. Alf 11:08, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.