Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of games from Whose Line Is It Anyway? (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 19:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

List of games from Whose Line Is It Anyway?
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Entire article is too trivia. This is unencyclopedic. Please read WP:IINFO & WP:FANCRUFT. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  15:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 21:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  10:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not encyclopedic - in world. Szzuk (talk) 21:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge as a section of the Whose Line Is It Anyway? article.  → Michael J Ⓣ Ⓒ Ⓜ 23:53, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * There already is a games section and that takes the key notable points. Besides it is too big to be a section of the main article. Would it go on the British article or the American article? The contents is too large to be a sub-section. It still does not escape the fact of it being unencyclopedic and trivia. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  00:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete unsourced and unnecessary WP:LISTCRUFT. Kraxler (talk) 18:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.