Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gimmicks in television shows


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 00:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

List of gimmicks in television shows

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Heavy on the OR. WP:NOT Indiscriminate Information. And subjective inclusion criteria. Some editors attempting to create their own definition for "gimmicks in television shows"... and then trying to apply their definition to some TV shows. Saikokira 00:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The page gimmick already has some examples of gimmicks in TV shows, we don't need to have an exhaustive and ill-defined list. -- Mithent 01:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gotta say delete on this one. Too broad, inevitable OR problems. Goodnightmush  Talk 02:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom, fails WP:NOT. Info in list is covered in main articles.-- Bryson { Talk } { Edits } 02:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, no criteria for inclusion, and an indiscriminate list. -- Cy ru s      An dir on   12:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- Would be a good categorie although even that is a little to broad. -- St.daniel talk 17:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unencyclopedic, will have POV problems and OR. --Dweller 13:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsourced, trivial, WP:NOT. Concur with Mithent, a few examples under gimmick are more than sufficient to illustrate the principle.  Ar ky an  &#149; (talk) 15:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. One man's gimmick is another man's plot device. Very ill-defined and subject to POV. Realkyhick 18:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT violations. Acalamari 20:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Define a Gimmick. Would have some WP:NPOV issues... ffm ✎ talk  13:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.