Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of godchildren of members of the British Royal Family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

List of godchildren of members of the British Royal Family

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unnecessary list. What makes a list of godchildren notable? In fact who gets included or not in this list? WHO exactly ARE the "British Royal Family"? Re5x (talk) 04:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being a godchild is not a significant distinction. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  15:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as not convincing for its own article. SwisterTwister   talk  23:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete being a godchild of a notable person is insufficient to establish notability. Heck, being the actual child of a notable person is insufficient by itself to establish notability, because notability is not inherited. (Being a child of a royal may be one of the few exceptions to this rule, since it entails a place in the succession to the throne and possibly titles/styles like prince, princess, His/Her Royal Highness, etc; but being a godchild of a royal entails none of these things.) Otherwise, we'd have List of children of celebrities SJK (talk) 04:03, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - interesting to me, but how is this notable? Bearian (talk) 20:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.