Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of greatest tyrants in world history


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

List of greatest tyrants in world history
Pretty obvious. What more POV a list could you think of? (particularly when it includes e.g. Robert Menzies) Absolutely no need for such a contentious list. Slac speak up! 23:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete POV, breaches WP:NOR--Arktos talk 00:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete well, duh. Danny Lilithborne 00:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Could we not just WP:SNOW this one? Is there any chance that even a single person, with the exception of the article's creator, would not choose to delete this page? -- Kicking222 02:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Personally, I think Ferdinand Marcos was pretty mediocre, as tyrants go, so yeah: POV. And no, it shouldn't be SNOW-balled until there's some actual snow. Patience, grasshopper. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 03:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "greatest" and "tyrants" are both POV. You cannot get any more obvious than that. JChap2007 05:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with extreme prejudice. This seems to be using a pretty bizarre definition of "tyrant", to boot; many of the people listed weren't rulers. Kirill Lokshin 05:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gazpacho 05:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wimstead 11:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious POV.--Húsönd 13:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.