Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of groups of nine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 07:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

List of groups of nine

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NOT of loosely associated topics. The Lord of the Rings, the Supreme Court of the United States, Stargate... they're all here. Equally ridiculous lists were previously deleted at Articles for deletion/List of groups of four, Articles for deletion/List of groups of six, and Articles for deletion/List of groups of seven. Masaruemoto 00:20, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom amd stated precedent. MSJapan 00:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- per WP:NOT. E  ddie  00:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of lists of people-related deletions.   — E  ddie  00:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, but see if we can get our current supreme court replaced by the fellowship of the ring. Capmango 02:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Pointless. But now you have figuring out which Justice matches which Fellow... Roberts and Boromir? Thomas and Gimli? The mind boggles. Brianyoumans 04:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I vote for Ginsberg and Gollum .. wait, he wasn't a member of the nine. Drat.  Delete, by the way.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 17:28, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete, loosely associated topics. Useight 05:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Not a criteria for speedy deletion. Morgan Wick 01:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - why is nine important? Who knows.  Indiscriminate.  --Haemo 09:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * O Nein!-- since groups of four, six, and seven were deleted, it looks like this article will have a similar fate, which is actually okay... there's an article entitled 9 (Number) and most of this seems to be drawn from that... whatever is new from this article would fit there nicely. Mandsford 00:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.