Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of highest grossing Nepali films


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

List of highest grossing Nepali films
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The references are not reliable. Even if they are, I do not think there is any rationale in having a list with only 1 entity.  Jupitus Smart  05:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 05:50, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 05:50, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 05:50, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - A redirect would work just as effectively as a deletion, provided a proper target could be found. I had to chop a good deal of content in these edits because the sources were poor and didn't support the claims anyway. Nepal has a bit of a challenge establishing reliable sources that can comment reliably on film finances. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I saw what you did Cyphoidbomb, but I do feel that even though what you did was the correct thing to do, it has left the article without any context in remaining as a stand alone article. Maybe when better sources come up we can re-instate the article. Besides the only reference still remaining talks about a movie called Kohinoor and has no mention of the movie it is listed against (In this case Chhakka Panja). Also lack of proper sources for other movies may give of the idea that Chhakka Panja is the highest grossing movie, when it may not be so.  Jupitus Smart  09:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't disagree with any of that. I'm merely proposing that redirection is an equal possibility to deletion. I know nothing about Nepali news sources, so if they have a strong journalism base, maybe it's reasonable to redirect until content can be found. If Nepal doesn't have a wide selection of reliable news outlets, then maybe it's more reasonable to delete. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 11:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless sources are found, this fails WP:V, and from what I can tell, there isn't anything coming up to demonstrate reliable stats on this.  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 17:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V; entirely unsourced. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.