Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of historical Camden County, New Jersey municipalities


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Cbrown1023 talk 00:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

List of historical Camden County, New Jersey municipalities

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Collection of information without explanation or context. (Does historical indicate once existed and doesn't exist now or once existed and may exist now?) Has some kind of structure indicated by indenting but I can't figure out what the indenting means. Has dates (years) but doesn't indicate what the dates are (probably date of source but not stated). Source not indicated. Tagged for cleanup since September 2005. (If someone can explain what this is I'll withdraw my nomination, but I can't clean it up because I don't know what it means.) RJFJR 16:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, and I'd also change my vote if someone could make this bizarre list clear. Clearly some work went into it, and clearly not enough.Noroton 00:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This was intended to be a family tree of municipalities in Camden County, New Jersey. Many of these municipalities are now defunct, and I have been working on a project to provide the history of these municipalities, many of which are in Category:Defunct municipalities in New Jersey. I neglected to make the needed changes to this article while I have been doing another run through New Jersey's 566 municipalities, but I promise that I will update this article. Alansohn 01:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep real places defunct now or not are notable. Carlossuarez46 01:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Notability was never challenged. Not all AFDs are about notability.  RJFJR 15:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If you think the content or context of the article needs improving, mark it so; there is no magic time after wich a clean up tag means it's OK to delete otherwise, albeit confusing or poorly written, encyclopedic material. Carlossuarez46 16:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep/Recreate/Rewrite - With cleanup and sourced information, this will be a useful article. If it is deleted, it should be recreated properly.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, but needs some work. Specifically, it should mention why those municipalities were merged, split, incorporated, de-incorporated, or whatever their fate was.  With expansion, this article could make a good contribution toward the history of the county.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 17:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.