Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Carisbrook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all, clear consensus exists. Daniel (talk) 01:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

List of international cricket centuries at Carisbrook

 * – ( View AfD View log )

In continuation of previous AfD Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Dubai International Cricket Stadium, the consensus is that centuries on these grounds are not prestigious enough for a list. No source discuss them as a group, fails WP:NLIST. Störm  (talk)  15:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

Thanks. Störm  (talk)  16:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete All Wikipedia is not...WP:NOT and pick one. -- A Rose Wolf  18:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all per previous AfD outcome and WP:NOTSTATS WP:NOTIINFO WP:NOTMIRROR and WP:FANCRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 19:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge all to the main ground article, where that does not create issues with regards to WP:NOTSTATS/WP:SPLIT. Taken on their own they are a gross violation of WP:NOT, but in the context of the main article about the ground international centuries are not indiscriminate, or without context or explanation. wjematherplease leave a message... 13:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * This is the exact same debate we are having with regards to lists of centuries by individual players. If you say they are a gross violation of WP:NOT then it makes no different if the lists appear on a separate list or on a player's or ground's article, it is policy. Ajf773 (talk) 09:05, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * My point is that they should not be taken alone, but as part of the main article, and as such do not violate NOTSTATS – not excessive or indiscriminate, have context and explanation, and are reliably sourced. NOTSTATS does not mean "no stats". wjematherplease leave a message... 09:52, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * And my point is they shouldn't. It's not the job of Wikipedia to be a collection of statscruft. Ajf773 (talk) 08:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete all per previous AfDs. Not at all convinced that exhaustive lists by venue are at all useful. Nigej (talk) 14:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. Sources do not seem to discuss such events as a list, per previous AFD. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 14:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Wikipedia is not a stats website. ☎️  Churot  DancePop 15:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all - I'm not unhappy about deleting every List of centuries on... article tbh. I'm not convinced that most of these have a place on ground articles either, beyond a short prose summary. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all under WP:NOTSTATS. Theleekycauldron (talk) 00:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all per WP:NOTSTATS. Regards --Kemalcan (talk) 12:26, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.