Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Central Broward Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Central Broward Park. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:04, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

List of international cricket centuries at Central Broward Park

 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * Note: Part of previous mass-AFD closed as "keep (snow close)" with a suggestion that a follow-up RFC was forthcoming: Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Basin Reserve

Duplicate of information already presented in the parent Central Broward Park article. That article is not so long as to require a split, and this is an excessively short unnecessary listicle. Harrias (he/him) • talk 10:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Harrias  (he/him) • talk 10:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  10:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:33, 21 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Entirely unnecessary duplication of content/attempted split from the parent article. wjematherplease leave a message... 11:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 12:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect - the merge is effectively already done and this isn't going to be suitable for a standalone list for many years. Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect - the most sensible option here Spiderone  12:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect and keep history or Keep unless there has been an RFC after the 2019 mass-AFD (Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Basin Reserve), in which case please ping me so I can read the results of that RFC and update this comment. Don't delete outright. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  15:06, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * As far as I am aware there has been no such RFC, but note that such an RFC was to deal with this type of article in general, whether it had three entries, or three hundred. This specific AfD relates to this specific article, which is a redundant content fork of the parent article. Harrias  (he/him) • talk 15:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Agree, this is a content fork with a cut+paste list from the original article. I forget what the standalone criteria is (20 or 25 centuries), but at the current rate, it'll probably be 20 or 25 years before that is reached. If there was a lot more centuries AND a realistic chance that more would happen in the near future, then this would be a keep.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 17:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. I PRODed this a few weeks ago, but haven't had the time to follow up the de-PROD. The list is far too short to warrant a stand alone article. So per nom. StickyWicket (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.