Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Dubai International Cricket Stadium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Daniel (talk) 06:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

List of international cricket centuries at Dubai International Cricket Stadium

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Hundreds are pretty common on this cricket ground. We should keep such lists only for grounds where it is prestigious to score a hundred. Fails WP:NLIST, no coverage in WP:RS about this list as a group. Störm  (talk)  20:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for same reason:

Thanks. Störm  (talk)  21:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete all per WP:NOTSTATS WP:NOTIINFO WP:NOTMIRROR and WP:FANCRUFT all sourced from ESPNCricinfo which can be easily found on its Statsguru. Ajf773 (talk) 19:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate statistical database; no indication or evidence of importance to warrant an entry in a general encyclopaedia Spiderone  22:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all. WP:LISTCRUFT. No substantial coverage of these intersections so fails WP:NLIST; also fails WP:NOTSTATS, WP:NOTMIRROR. wjematherplease leave a message... 13:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No need of specific list in this case. NavjotSR (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all - Just stats. This is an encyclopedia not a stats site. Nigej (talk) 19:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep/Delete all to a point. I understand all the points made about them not following WPs, but could someone explain/direct me to what makes these grounds unworthy compared to a numerous amount of others? If these lists are too stats-based, doesn't that make any list about centuries/five-wicket hauls by players or at grounds? Joalhe1997 (talk) 16:44, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't think it would apply to players - quite often we hear of someones nth Test century. Never heard a commentator say that its the 47th Test century at Manchester (or whatever). So it would perhaps apply to other grounds, except probably Lord's where getting a Test century is actually notable. Nigej (talk) 18:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.